Dr. Archibald’s ENGL 110
Peer Editing Process: The 3Research Project
Reviewers name: Natasha Mosier
Peer Editing Process: The 3Research Project
Reviewers name: Natasha Mosier
Paper author’s name: Alicia Whisler
Has the writer written a research paper . . .
[medium]
X that joins a conversation (where there is a controversy), that listens to others who have been talking about the topic (old and new docs & sources), and then posits a unique idea(s) in an effort to extend the discussion?
__Or, is the paper substantially a report (a "data-dump") of what others have said?
__Or, is it an extended opinion piece that gives no support for the writer's ideas?
__Or, is it merely plagiarized? (this item trumps everything else and results in an "F" in the course.
Comment: The paper kept me interested all the way through.
[opening & introduction]
X that contains an opening to the paper that hooks the reader and introduces the writer and his/her purpose for writing the essay? Is there a forecast of what the paper will contain?
Comment:
[use of research question & thesis]
X where they employ their research question that then is answered in a thesis and set forward in the paper?
Comment:
[use of sources]
X where the writer introduce his/her sources, summarize, paraphrase, and/or quote them, and then provide a comment for each one that advances their thesis?
[paragraph construction]
X that contains an argument that flows--claim, support, result?
Comment:
[conclusion]
X that contains a conclusion that works to sum up or extend the ideas of the paper?
Comment:
[works cited and in-text citations]
X that contains well integrated sources, a Works Cited page, and In-text citations conform to the MLA format?
Comment: I didn’t see the works cited attached to this.
[sentence-level rhetoric]
X where the writer has edited the paper carefully for grammatical and punctuation errors?
Comment:
[medium]
X that joins a conversation (where there is a controversy), that listens to others who have been talking about the topic (old and new docs & sources), and then posits a unique idea(s) in an effort to extend the discussion?
__Or, is the paper substantially a report (a "data-dump") of what others have said?
__Or, is it an extended opinion piece that gives no support for the writer's ideas?
__Or, is it merely plagiarized? (this item trumps everything else and results in an "F" in the course.
Comment: The paper kept me interested all the way through.
[opening & introduction]
X that contains an opening to the paper that hooks the reader and introduces the writer and his/her purpose for writing the essay? Is there a forecast of what the paper will contain?
Comment:
[use of research question & thesis]
X where they employ their research question that then is answered in a thesis and set forward in the paper?
Comment:
[use of sources]
X where the writer introduce his/her sources, summarize, paraphrase, and/or quote them, and then provide a comment for each one that advances their thesis?
[paragraph construction]
X that contains an argument that flows--claim, support, result?
Comment:
[conclusion]
X that contains a conclusion that works to sum up or extend the ideas of the paper?
Comment:
[works cited and in-text citations]
X that contains well integrated sources, a Works Cited page, and In-text citations conform to the MLA format?
Comment: I didn’t see the works cited attached to this.
[sentence-level rhetoric]
X where the writer has edited the paper carefully for grammatical and punctuation errors?
Comment:
Dr. Archibald’s ENGL 110
Peer Editing Process: The 3Research Project
Reviewers name: Natasha Mosier
Peer Editing Process: The 3Research Project
Reviewers name: Natasha Mosier
Paper author’s name: Ian Shannon
Has the writer written a research paper . . .
[medium]
X that joins a conversation (where there is a controversy), that listens to others who have been talking about the topic (old and new docs & sources), and then posits a unique idea(s) in an effort to extend the discussion?
__Or, is the paper substantially a report (a "data-dump") of what others have said?
__Or, is it an extended opinion piece that gives no support for the writer's ideas?
__Or, is it merely plagiarized? (this item trumps everything else and results in an "F" in the course.
Comment: After reading your paper I went onto my Facebook account and made sure to check all of my privacy settings. Your paper kept me interested as this is something we all should be concerned about.
[opening & introduction]
X that contains an opening to the paper that hooks the reader and introduces the writer and his/her purpose for writing the essay? Is there a forecast of what the paper will contain?
Comment: Privacy with in the U.S. and social media
[use of research question & thesis]
X where they employ their research question that then is answered in a thesis and set forward in the paper?
Comment:
[use of sources]
X where the writer introduce his/her sources, summarize, paraphrase, and/or quote them, and then provide a comment for each one that advances their thesis?
[paragraph construction]
X that contains an argument that flows--claim, support, result?
Comment: The flow was great
[conclusion]
X that contains a conclusion that works to sum up or extend the ideas of the paper?
Comment:
[works cited and in-text citations]
X that contains well integrated sources, a Works Cited page, and In-text citations conform to the MLA format?
Comment:
[sentence-level rhetoric]
X where the writer has edited the paper carefully for grammatical and punctuation errors?
Comment:
[medium]
X that joins a conversation (where there is a controversy), that listens to others who have been talking about the topic (old and new docs & sources), and then posits a unique idea(s) in an effort to extend the discussion?
__Or, is the paper substantially a report (a "data-dump") of what others have said?
__Or, is it an extended opinion piece that gives no support for the writer's ideas?
__Or, is it merely plagiarized? (this item trumps everything else and results in an "F" in the course.
Comment: After reading your paper I went onto my Facebook account and made sure to check all of my privacy settings. Your paper kept me interested as this is something we all should be concerned about.
[opening & introduction]
X that contains an opening to the paper that hooks the reader and introduces the writer and his/her purpose for writing the essay? Is there a forecast of what the paper will contain?
Comment: Privacy with in the U.S. and social media
[use of research question & thesis]
X where they employ their research question that then is answered in a thesis and set forward in the paper?
Comment:
[use of sources]
X where the writer introduce his/her sources, summarize, paraphrase, and/or quote them, and then provide a comment for each one that advances their thesis?
[paragraph construction]
X that contains an argument that flows--claim, support, result?
Comment: The flow was great
[conclusion]
X that contains a conclusion that works to sum up or extend the ideas of the paper?
Comment:
[works cited and in-text citations]
X that contains well integrated sources, a Works Cited page, and In-text citations conform to the MLA format?
Comment:
[sentence-level rhetoric]
X where the writer has edited the paper carefully for grammatical and punctuation errors?
Comment:
Dr. Archibald’s ENGL 110
Peer Editing Process: The 3Research Project
Reviewers name: Natasha Mosier
Peer Editing Process: The 3Research Project
Reviewers name: Natasha Mosier
Paper author’s name: Marianna Romejko
Has the writer written a research paper . . .
[medium]
X that joins a conversation (where there is a controversy), that listens to others who have been talking about the topic (old and new docs & sources), and then posits a unique idea(s) in an effort to extend the discussion?
__Or, is the paper substantially a report (a "data-dump") of what others have said?
__Or, is it an extended opinion piece that gives no support for the writer's ideas?
__Or, is it merely plagiarized? (this item trumps everything else and results in an "F" in the course.
Comment:
[opening & introduction]
X that contains an opening to the paper that hooks the reader and introduces the writer and his/her purpose for writing the essay? Is there a forecast of what the paper will contain?
Comment:
[use of research question & thesis]
X where they employ their research question that then is answered in a thesis and set forward in the paper?
Comment:
[use of sources]
X where the writer introduce his/her sources, summarize, paraphrase, and/or quote them, and then provide a comment for each one that advances their thesis?
[paragraph construction]
X that contains an argument that flows--claim, support, result?
Comment: Using Casey Anthony was great. It is still very fresh in the media and throughout the U.S.
[conclusion]
X that contains a conclusion that works to sum up or extend the ideas of the paper?
Comment:
[works cited and in-text citations]
X that contains well integrated sources, a Works Cited page, and In-text citations conform to the MLA format?
Comment:
[sentence-level rhetoric]
X where the writer has edited the paper carefully for grammatical and punctuation errors?
Comment:
[medium]
X that joins a conversation (where there is a controversy), that listens to others who have been talking about the topic (old and new docs & sources), and then posits a unique idea(s) in an effort to extend the discussion?
__Or, is the paper substantially a report (a "data-dump") of what others have said?
__Or, is it an extended opinion piece that gives no support for the writer's ideas?
__Or, is it merely plagiarized? (this item trumps everything else and results in an "F" in the course.
Comment:
[opening & introduction]
X that contains an opening to the paper that hooks the reader and introduces the writer and his/her purpose for writing the essay? Is there a forecast of what the paper will contain?
Comment:
[use of research question & thesis]
X where they employ their research question that then is answered in a thesis and set forward in the paper?
Comment:
[use of sources]
X where the writer introduce his/her sources, summarize, paraphrase, and/or quote them, and then provide a comment for each one that advances their thesis?
[paragraph construction]
X that contains an argument that flows--claim, support, result?
Comment: Using Casey Anthony was great. It is still very fresh in the media and throughout the U.S.
[conclusion]
X that contains a conclusion that works to sum up or extend the ideas of the paper?
Comment:
[works cited and in-text citations]
X that contains well integrated sources, a Works Cited page, and In-text citations conform to the MLA format?
Comment:
[sentence-level rhetoric]
X where the writer has edited the paper carefully for grammatical and punctuation errors?
Comment:
1) When you refer to Lindbergh Baby you use capitalize Baby a few times and then refer to it as the Linbergh baby in lower case form. It is baby or Baby?
2) O.J. Simpson you use O.J. and then just OJ
3) What is CCC? I see the abbreviation but what does it stand for?
